Editor’s Brief1
After a few months off, DTS is back with another company profile. This week we look at Integrate, a Seattle software company developing a shared program schedule to accelerate procurement timelines
Note: I am joining The Merge as a Contributing Editor, writing company breakdowns for the Premium newsletter on Thursdays. If you read DTS for the deep dives on individual companies and want to get more, subscribe here.
DTS isn't going away. You'll still see some company coverage here, but I'll also spend more time on things like how acquisition offices buy, where defense capital is going, and what the PAE structures actually do.
As always, your feedback shapes our coverage—reply directly with insights or questions.
Signal Brief: Integrate — One Schedule, Every Classification
Integrate Space Corporation is a Seattle-based software company building a multi-organization program-management platform. Instead of every program office, prime, and supplier maintaining its own version of the schedule, the software enables real-time cross-organizational schedule synchronization with granular task-level permission controls so collaborators see only intended information.
Origins & Vision
Founded in 2022 by John Conafay, Andrew Sloan, Kellie Higa, and Paul Reesman, Integrate Space Corporation began as a project-management software for commercial space hardware builders. Conafay served in the Air Force, then worked at Spire, Astranis, Spaceflight Inc., and ABL Space Systems, where he worked on launch business tied to Amazon's Kuiper constellation. Sloan came from product and design, including Momentus. Higa came from full-stack software development.
In July 2023, Space Systems Command (SSC) signed a roughly $1.25 million SBIR Phase II contract. The software supported launch-management workflows associated with Tactically Responsive Space and Firefly's Victus Nox mission, with Conafay describing the product as "Google Docs for project management."
Integrate spent heavily, relative to its size, to get the product into classified environments and deployed through Second Front Systems' Game Warden platform onto IL6 in less than a year. SSC then signed a follow-on sole-source SBIR Phase III contract in April of 2025.
In February 2026, the company raised a $17 million Series A and in August 2026, they announced a $6 million venture debt facility from J.P. Morgan. The company now describes its mission more broadly as orchestrating critical programs across land, maritime, air, space, and cyber and is supporting Space Systems Integration Office (SSIO) integration of the rapidly growing national security space systems portfolio.
Key Takeaways
Successful SBIR transition — Integrate’s Phase II became a Phase III, the buy shifted from R&D to an actual SaaS contract, and the product moved from one launch office into SSIO.
Built for the PAE model — The Space Force's nine Portfolio Acquisition Executives now hold more than 90% of the service's non-restricted delegated contracting authorities. Cross-program visibility becomes more valuable when acquisition authority moves upward from individual programs into portfolios.
Concentrated revenue footprint — Roughly $12.7 million of federal obligations are publicly identifiable through FY2026, and virtually all of that money comes through a single Space Systems Command contracting office.
Tech Radar:
Integrate Platform — The Multiplayer Master Schedule

Credit: Integrate
Integrate replaces contractor-specific systems, spreadsheets, and periodic IMS submissions, reconciled by hand with one synchronized schedule. Tasks, dependencies, milestones, and status changes propagate through one underlying program structure, and permissions decide what each organization or user sees. It's delivered as software as a service through Game Warden.
Key Capabilities
Precision Access: Fine-grained permissions allow organizations to share the tasks and milestones required for coordination without exposing every underlying piece of proprietary or restricted information.
Dependency and critical-path management: Programs can connect engineering, manufacturing, software, testing, and supplier dependencies and see what changes when one slips and run critical-path analysis on schedules.
Interoperability: Supports workflows involving tools such as Smartsheet, Jira, and Excel rather than requiring every participant to abandon its existing internal stack.
Classified deployment: The product operates on NIPR at IL5, SIPR at IL6, and JWICS for Top Secret programs through Game Warden and applicable authorizations.
Market Signals
Funding & Growth
Total Funding: $21.4M across three rounds, plus a $6M venture debt facility (Aug 2026)
Latest Round: $17 million Series A (Feb 2026)
Notable Investors: FPV Ventures, Hyperplane, Riot Ventures, Ravelin Capital, Fuse VC, Rsquared VC, New Vista.
Valuation: Undisclosed
Contracts & Government Traction
$1.25M SBIR Phase II / SSC (Jul 2023) — FA881123C0001, launch manifest integration software.
$26.6M SBIR Phase III IDIQ / SSC Launch Enterprise (Apr 2025) — FA881125CB002, sole-source Phase III for Integrate SaaS; five-year period of performance through April 2030. ~$11.4M obligated
Space Systems Integration Office (Aug 2026) — A contract expanding Integrate into portfolio-level acquisition management, including work touching the Space Data Network and Space-Based Airborne Moving Target Indicator.
SHIELD IDIQ / Missile Defense Agency (Dec 2025) — A seat on the Scalable Homeland Innovative Enterprise Layered Defense (SHIELD) vehicle. Integrate's guaranteed minimum is $500.
Looking Ahead
On November 8, 1955, the Navy named Rear Adm. William "Red" Raborn director of its new Special Projects Office. His task was a submarine-launched ballistic missile that would reach interim capability by early 1963 and full capability by early 1965.
The program required a new submarine, a solid-fuel missile, inertial navigation, and fire control, all developed at once by thousands of contractors, racing against the Soviets.
To manage it, the office worked with Lockheed and Booz Allen Hamilton to build the Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT). PERT modeled the program as a network of interdependent events, estimated how long each would take, and computed the critical path.
USS George Washington (SSBN-598) was commissioned December 30, 1959, made the first submerged Polaris launch on July 20, 1960, and left on the Navy's first deterrent patrol that November 15, more than two years ahead of the interim target.
By the early 1960s, PERT-style networks had spread across DoD and NASA, and the Integrated Master Schedule every program office maintains today descends from that work.
[[In 1972, political scientist Harvey Sapolsky found that PERT may have contributed little to the technical result. Its value was political: the charts gave Polaris the appearance of complete control, which kept Congress and OSD from interfering, and the autonomy let the Special Projects Office solve the actual problems.]]
PERT's descendants haven’t solved the problem. GAO says the average major defense program now takes more than 12 years to deliver a capability, and the IMS arrives as periodic submissions from each contractor, reconciled by hand against everything that changed in between.
Sixty-six years to the day after George Washington's Polaris launch, the President signed an executive order on defense supply chains. Section 3 directs the Pentagon to require contractors at every tier to map critical supply chains, vet suppliers, and report significant risks, followed by corrective action plans with "a strict projected timeline" and mitigations tracked until closure.
Mapping the supply chain shows where a program is exposed. It doesn't show which milestones a failing supplier threatens, who owns the fix, or whether recovery is on track.
Integrate's shared schedule could connect the supplier, prime, and program office around that recovery plan: assign an accountable owner, re-sequence work, track dependencies, and keep mitigation actions visible through completion.
They would still need other data and tools to support supplier vetting or raw-material traceability but Its and opportunity to help managers turn identified risks into decisions before delays cascade.
Challenges
Customer concentration. Virtually all identifiable federal obligations still originate from one SSC contracting office. The SSIO expansion is encouraging, but publicly visible revenue diversification has not yet caught up.
Enterprise competition. The Navy's $448 million ShipOS effort explicitly includes schedule, cost, and risk visibility, while the Army's Palantir enterprise agreement carries a ceiling of up to $10 billion.
Accreditation dependence. Integrate reached the classified market quickly by building on Second Front's Game Warden infrastructure but it also means part of the security and deployment moat belongs to the platform underneath Integrate.
Bottom Line:
The Navy built PERT because no one could see Polaris whole. The Space Force now has the same problem across nine portfolios, and Integrate is a textbook example of the SBIR transition: a Phase II prototype that became a sole-source Phase III SAAS contract.
In an April DefenseScoop op-ed, Integrate's head of Washington operations made the broader case: the Pentagon's business systems are no different from any large company's, and it should buy mature commercial software built with AI from the start and deployable on classified networks, rather than funding custom builds and GOTS solutions.
PERT spread from one program to the whole department. Integrate is making the case that its kind of software should too.
1 The views expressed in this newsletter are my own and do not represent the views of the U.S. Navy, Department of Defense, or any government agency. Mention of companies, technologies, or products is not an endorsement or recommendation. The content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice.
